home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Text File | 1993-08-18 | 55.0 KB | 1,386 lines |
- Newsgroups: rec.puzzles,news.answers,rec.answers
- Path: senator-bedfellow.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!gatech!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!uunet!questrel!chris
- From: chris@questrel.com (Chris Cole)
- Subject: rec.puzzles Archive (competition), part 09 of 35
- Message-ID: <puzzles/archive/competition/part4_745653851@questrel.com>
- Followup-To: rec.puzzles
- Summary: This is part of an archive of questions
- and answers that may be of interest to
- puzzle enthusiasts.
- Part 1 contains the index to the archive.
- Read the rec.puzzles FAQ for more information.
- Sender: chris@questrel.com (Chris Cole)
- Reply-To: archive-comment@questrel.com
- Organization: Questrel, Inc.
- References: <puzzles/archive/Instructions_745653851@questrel.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1993 06:04:57 GMT
- Approved: news-answers-request@MIT.Edu
- Expires: Thu, 1 Sep 1994 06:04:11 GMT
- Lines: 1364
- Xref: senator-bedfellow.mit.edu rec.puzzles:25004 news.answers:11524 rec.answers:1924
-
- Archive-name: puzzles/archive/competition/part4
- Last-modified: 17 Aug 1993
- Version: 4
-
-
- ==> competition/tests/math/putnam/putnam.1987.p <==
- WILLIAM LOWELL PUTNAM MATHEMATICAL COMPETITION
-
- FORTY EIGHTH ANNUAL Saturday, December 5, 1987
-
- Examination A;
-
- Problem A-1
- ------- ---
-
- Curves A, B, C, and D, are defined in the plane as follows:
-
- A = { (x,y) : x^2 - y^2 = x/(x^2 + y^2) },
-
- B = { (x,y) : 2xy + y/(x^2 + y^2) = 3 },
-
- C = { (x,y) : x^3 - 3xy^2 + 3y = 1 },
-
- D = { (x,y) : 3yx^2 - 3x - y^3 = 0 }.
-
- Prove that the intersection of A and B is equal to the intersection of
- C and D.
-
-
- Problem A-2
- ------- ---
-
- The sequence of digits
-
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 2 0 2 1 ...
-
- is obtained by writing the positive integers in order. If the 10^n th
- digit in this sequence occurs in the part of the sequence in which the
- m-digit numbers are placed, define f(n) to be m. For example f(2) = 2
- because the 100th digit enters the sequence in the placement of the
- two-digit integer 55. Find, with proof, f(1987).
-
-
- Problem A-3
- ------- ---
-
- For all real x, the real valued function y = f(x) satisfies
-
- y'' - 2y' + y = 2e^x.
-
- (a) If f(x) > 0 for all real x, must f'(x) > 0 for all real x? Explain.
-
- (b) If f'(x) > 0 for all real x, must f(x) > 0 for all real x? Explain.
-
-
- Problem A-4
- ------- ---
-
- Let P be a polynomial, with real coefficients, in three variables and F
- be a function of two variables such that
-
- P(ux,uy,uz) = u^2*F(y-x,z-x) for all real x,y,z,u,
-
- and such that P(1,0,0) = 4, P(0,1,0) = 5, and P(0,0,1) = 6. Also let
- A,B,C be complex numbers with P(A,B,C) = 0 and |B-A| = 10. Find
- |C-A|.
-
-
- Problem A-5
- ------- ---
-
- ^
- Let G(x,y) = ( -y/(x^2 + 4y^2) , x/(x^2 + 4y^2), 0 ). Prove or disprove
- that there is a vector-valued function
-
- ^
- F(x,y,z) = ( M(x,y,z) , N(x,y,z) , P(x,y,z) )
-
- with the following properties:
-
-
- (1) M,N,P have continuous partial derivatives for all
- (x,y,z) <> (0,0,0) ;
-
- ^ ^
- (2) Curl F = 0 for all (x,y,z) <> (0,0,0) ;
-
- ^ ^
- (3) F(x,y,0) = G(x,y).
-
-
- Problem A-6
- ------- ---
-
- For each positive integer n, let a(n) be the number of zeros in the
- base 3 representation of n. For which positive real numbers x does
- the series
-
- inf
- -----
- \ x^a(n)
- > ------
- / n^3
- -----
- n = 1
-
- converge?
- --
-
-
- Examination B;
-
- Problem B-1
- ------- ---
-
- 4/ (ln(9-x))^(1/2) dx
- Evaluate | --------------------------------- .
- 2/ (ln(9-x))^(1/2) + (ln(x+3))^(1/2)
-
-
- Problem B-2
- ------- ---
-
- Let r, s, and t be integers with 0 =< r, 0 =< s, and r+s =< t.
-
- Prove that
-
- ( s ) ( s ) ( s ) ( s )
- ( 0 ) ( 1 ) ( 2 ) ( s ) t+1
- ----- + ------- + ------- + ... + ------- = ---------------- .
- ( t ) ( t ) ( t ) ( t ) ( t+1-s )( t-s )
- ( r ) ( r+1 ) ( r+2 ) ( r+s ) ( r )
-
-
- ( n ) n(n-1)...(n+1-k)
- ( Note: ( k ) denotes the binomial coefficient ---------------- .)
- k(k-1)...3*2*1
-
-
- Problem B-3
- ------- ---
-
- Let F be a field in which 1+1 <> 0. Show that the set of solutions to
- the equation x^2 + y^2 = 1 with x and y in F is given by
-
- (x,y) = (1,0)
-
- r^2 - 1 2r
- and (x,y) = ( ------- , ------- ),
- r^2 + 1 r^2 + 1
-
- where r runs through the elements of F such that r^2 <> -1.
-
-
- Problem B-4
- ------- ---
-
- Let ( x(1), y(1) ) = (0.8,0.6) and let
-
- x(n+1) = x(n)*cos(y(n)) - y(n)*sin(y(n))
-
- and y(n+1) = x(n)*sin(y(n)) + y(n)*cos(y(n))
-
- for n = 1,2,3,... . For each of the limits as n --> infinity of
- x(n) and y(n), prove that the limit exists and find it or prove that
- the limit does not exist.
-
-
- Problem B-5
- ------- ---
-
- Let O(n) be the n-dimensional zero vector (0,0,...,0). Let M be a
- 2n x n matrix of complex numbers such that whenever
- ( z(1), z(2), ..., z(2n)*M = O(n), with complex z(i), not all zero,
- then at least one of the z(i) is not real. Prove that for arbitrary
- real number r(1), r(2), ..., r(2n), there are complex numbers w(1),
- w(2), ..., w(n) such that
-
- ( ( w(1) ) ) ( r(1) )
- ( ( . ) ) ( . )
- Re ( M*( . ) ) = ( . ) .
- ( ( . ) ) ( . )
- ( ( w(n) ) ) ( r(2n) )
-
- (Note: If C is a matrix of complex numbers, Re(C) is the matrix whose
- entries are the real parts of entries of C.)
-
-
- Problem B-6
- ------- ---
-
- Let F be the field of p^2 elements where p is an odd prime. Suppose S
- is a set of (p^2-1)/2 distinct nonzero elements of F with the property
- that for each a <> 0 in F, exactly one of a and -a is in S. Let N be
- the number of elements in the intersection of S with { 2a : a e S }.
- Prove that N is even.
- --
-
- ==> competition/tests/math/putnam/putnam.1987.s <==
- Problem A-1
- ------- ---
-
- Let z=x+i*y. Then A and B are the real and imaginary parts of
- z^2=3i+1/z, and C, D are likewise Re and Im of z^3-3iz=1, and
- the two equations are plainly equivalent. Alternatively, having
- seen this, we can formulate a solution that avoids explicitly
- invoking the complex numbers, starting with C=xA-yB, D=yA+xB.
-
- Problem A-2
- ------- ---
-
- Counting, we see that the numbers from 1 to n digits take
- up (10^n*(9n-1)+1)/9 spaces in the above sequence. Hence we need
- to find the least n for which 10^n*(9n-1)+1 > 9*10^1987, but it
- is easy to see that n = 1984 is the minimum such. Therefore
- f(1987) = 1984.
-
- In general, I believe, f(n) = n + 1 - g(n), where g(n) equals
- the largest value of m such that (10^m-1)/9 + 1 =< n if n>1,
- and g(0) = g(1) is defined to be 0.
-
- Hence, of course, g(n) = [log(9n-8)] if n>0. Therefore
-
-
- f(0) = 1,
-
- f(n) = n + 1 - [log(9n-8)] for n>0.
- Q.E.D.
-
-
- Problem A-3
- ------- ---
-
- We have a differential equation, solve it. The general solution is
-
- y = f(x) = e^x*(x^2 + a*x + b),
-
- where a and b are arbitrary real constants. Now use completing the
- square and the fact that e^x > 0 for all real x to deduce that
-
-
- (1) f(x) > 0 for all real x iff 4b > a^2.
-
- (2) f'(x) > 0 for all real x iff 4b > a^2 + 4.
-
-
- It is now obvious that (2) ==> (1) but (1) /==> (2).
-
- Q.E.D.
-
- Problem A-4
- ------- ---
-
- Setting x=0, u=1 we find F(y,z)=P(0,y,z) so F is a polynomial; keeping
- x=0 but varying u we find F(uy,uz)=u^2*F(y,z), so F is homogeneous of
- degree 2, i.e. of the form Ay^2+Byz+Cz^2, so
- P(x,y,z)=R(y-x)^2+S(y-x)(z-x)+T(z-x)^2
- for some real R,S,T. The three given values of P now specify three
- linear equations on R,S,T, easily solved to give (A,B,C)=(5,-7,6).
- If now P(A,B,C)=0 then (C-A)=r(B-A), r one of the two roots of
- 5-7r+6r^2. This quadratic has negative discrminant (=-71) so its
- roots are complex conjugates; since their product is 5/6, each
- one has absolute value sqrt(5/6). (Yes, you can also use the
- Quadratic Equation.) So if B-A has absolute value 10, C-A must
- have absolute value 10*sqrt(5/6)=5*sqrt(30)/3.
-
- Problem A-5
- ------- ---
-
- There is no such F. Proof: assume on the contrary that G extends
- to a curl-free vector field on R^3-{0}. Then the integral of G
- around any closed path in R^3-{0} vanishes because such a path
- bounds some surface [algebraic topologists, read: because
- H^2(R^3-{0},Z)=0 :-) ]. But we easily see that the integral
- of F around the closed path z=0, x^2+4y^2=1 (any closed path
- in the xy-plane that goes around the origin will do) is nonzero---
- contradiction.
-
- Problem A-6
- ------- ---
-
- For n>0 let
-
- T(n) = x^a(n)/n^3 and U(n) = T(3n) + T(3n+1) + T(3n+2)
-
- and for k>=0 let
-
- Z(k) = sum {n=3^k to 3^(k+1)-1} T(n)
-
- We have
-
- Z(k+1) = sum {n=3^(k+1) to 3^(k+2)-1} T(n)
- = sum {n=3^k to 3^(k+1)-1} [T(3n) + T(3n+1) + T(3n+2)]
- = sum {n=3^k to 3^(k+1)-1} U(n)
-
- Let us compare U(n) to T(n). We have a(3n)=a(n)+1 and a(3n+1)=a(3n+2)=a(n).
- Thus
-
- U(n) = x^[a(n)+1]/(3n)^3 + x^a(n)/(3n+1)^3 + x^a(n)/(3n+2)^3
-
- and so U(n) has as upper bound
-
- x^a(n) * (x+2)/(3n)^3 = T(n) * (x+2)/27
-
- and as lower bound
-
- x^a(n) * (x+2)/(3n+2)^3 = T(n) * (x+2)/(3+2/n)^3
-
- in other words U(n) = T(n) * (x+2)/(27+e(n)), where e(n)<(3+2/n)^3-27 tends to
- 0 when n tends to infinity. It follows then that
-
- Z(k+1)= Z(k)*(x+2)/(27+f(k))
-
- where f(k)<(3+2/3^k)^3-27 tends to 0 for n tending to infinity.
-
- Now the series is the sum of all Z(k). Thus for x>25 we have Z(k+1)>Z(k) for k
- large enough, and the series diverges; for x<25 we have Z(k+1)< r * Z(k) (with
- r=(x+2)/27<1) for every k, and the series converges. For x=25 the series
- diverges too (I think so), because Z(k+1)/Z(k) tends to 1 for k tending to
- infinity.
-
- Another proof:
-
- I would say,for x<25. Let S(m) be the sum above taken over 3^m <= n < 3^(m+1).
- Then for the n's in S(m), the base 3 representation of n has m+1 digits.
- Hence we can count the number of n's with a(n)=k as being the number
- of ways to choose a leading nonzero digit, times the number of ways
- to choose k positions out of the m other digits for the k zeroes, times
- the number of ways to choose nonzero digits for the m-k remaining positions,
- namely
-
- ( m ) m-k
- 2 ( ) 2 .
- ( k )
-
- Hence we have
-
- 3^(m+1)-1 m
- ----- -----
- \ a(n) \ ( m ) m-k k
- > x = > 2 ( ) 2 x
- / / ( k )
- ----- -----
- n=3^m k=0
-
- m
- = 2 (x+2) .
- m -3m m -3(m+1)
- Hence we can bound S(m) between 2 (x+2) 3 and 2 (x+2) 3 .
- It is then clear that the original sum converges just when
-
- inf
- -----
- \ m -3m
- > (x+2) 3 converges, or when x<25.
- /
- -----
- m=0
-
- Problem B-1
- ------- ---
-
- Write the integrand as
-
- (ln(x+3))^(1/2)
- 1 - --------------------------------- .
- (ln(9-x))^(1/2) + (ln(x+3))^(1/2)
-
- Use the change of variables x = 6-t on the above and the fact that
- the two are equal to deduce that the original is equal to 1.
-
- QED.
-
- Problem B-3
- ------- ---
-
- First note that the above values for x and y imply that
- x^2 + y^2 = 1. On the other foot note that if x<>1 ,x^2 + y^2 = 1,
- and 2 <> 0, then (x,y) is of the required form, with r = y/(1-x).
- Also note that r^2 <> -1, since this would imply x = 1.
-
- Derivation of r: We want x = (r^2-1)/(r^2+1) ==> 1-x = 2/(r^2+1),
- and also y = 2r/(r^2+1) ==> 1-x = (2y)/(2r) if 2<>0. Hence if
- 2<>0, r = y/(1-x).
-
- The above statement is false in some cases if 1+1 = 0 in F. For
- example, in Z(2) the solution (0,1) is not represented.
-
- QED.
-
- Problem B-4
- ------- ---
-
- Observe that the vector (x(n+1), y(n+1)) is obtained from (x(n), y(n))
- by a rotation through an angle of y(n). So if Theta(n) is the inclination
- of (x(n), y(n)), then for all n,
-
- Theta(n+1) = Theta(n) + y(n)
-
- Furthermore, all vectors have the same length, namely that of (x1, y1),
- which is 1. Therefore y(n) = sin (Theta(n)) and x(n) = cos (Theta(n)).
-
- Thus the recursion formula becomes
-
- (*) Theta(n+1) = Theta(n) + sin (Theta(n))
-
- Now 0 < Theta(1) < pi. By induction 0 < sin(Theta(n)) = sin(pi - Theta(n))
- < pi - Theta(n), so 0 < Theta(n+1) < Theta(n) + (pi - Theta(n)) = pi.
-
- Consequently, {Theta(n)} is an increasing sequence bounded above by pi, so
- it has a limit, Theta. From (*) we get Theta = Theta + sin(Theta),
- so with Theta in the interval (0,pi], the solution is Theta = pi.
-
- Thus lim (x(n),y(n)) = (cos(Theta), sin(Theta)) = (-1, 0).
-
- Problem B-5
- ------- ---
-
- First note that M has rank n, else its left nullspace N has C-dimension >n
- and so R-dimension >2n, and thus nontrivially intersects the R-codimension
- 2n subspace of vectors all of whose coordinates are real. Thus the
- subspace V of C^(2n) spanned by M's columns has C-dimsension n and so
- R-dimension 2n, and to prove the R-linear map Re: V-->R^(2n) surjective,
- we need only prove it injective. So assume on the contrary that v is
- a nonzero vector in V all of whose coordinates are purely imaginary,
- and let W be the orthogonal complement of <v>; this is a subspace of
- C^(2n) of C-dim. 2n-1 and R-dim. 4n-2 . W contains N,
- which we've seen has R-dimension 2n; it also contains the
- orthogonal complement of <i*v> in R^(2n), which has R-dimension 2n-1.
- Since (2n)+(2n-1) > (4n-2), these two real subspaces of W intersect
- nontrivially, producing a nonzero real vector in N---contradiction.
- So Re: V-->R^(2n) indeed has zero kernel and cokernel, Q.E.D. .
-
- Problem B-6
- ------- ---
-
- Let P be the product of elements of S; then P'=2^|S|*P, the product of
- the elements of 2S, is either P or -P according to whether |2S-S| is
- even or odd. (each element of 2S is either in S or in -S, so match
- the factors in the products for P and P'.) But by Fermat's little
- theorem, 2^(p-1)=1, and since |S|=(p^2-1)/2=(p-1)*(p+1)/2 is a multiple
- of p-1, also 2^|S|=1 and P=P', Q.E.D. .
-
- This solution--analogous to one of Gauss' proof of Quadratic
- Reciprocity--is undoubtedly what the proposers had in mind, and had
- it been the only solution, B-6 would be a difficult problem on a par
- with B-6 problems of previous years. Unfortunately, just knowing
- that F* is a cyclic group of order |F|-1 for any finite field F,
- one can split F* into cosets of the subgroup generated by 2 and -1
- and produce a straightforward, albeit plodding and uninspired, proof.
- I wonder how many of the contestants' answers to B-6 went this way
- and how many found the intended solution.
-
- Another proof:
-
- Given such a set S, it is immediate to verify that for any a in S, if
- one deletes a and adjoins -a to obtain a new set S' then the number
- of elements in the intersection of S' and 2S' is congruent (modulo 2)
- to the number of elements in the intersection of S and 2S. If S and
- S' are any two sets meeting the condition of this problem, then S can
- be changed to S' by repeating this operation several times. So, it
- suffices to prove the result for any one set S meeting the condition of
- the problem. A simple candidate for such an S is obtained by letting
- (u, v) be a basis for F over the field of p elements and letting S
- be the unions of the sets {au + bv: 1 <= u <= (p-1)/2, 0 <= b < p} and
- {bv: 0 <= b < (p-1)/2}. An elementary counting argument completes the
- proof.
-
- ==> competition/tests/math/putnam/putnam.1988.p <==
- Problem A-1: Let R be the region consisting of the points (x,y) of the
- cartesian plane satisfying both |x| - |y| <= 1 and |y| <= 1. Sketch
- the region R and find its area.
-
- Problem A-2: A not uncommon calculus mistake is to believe that the
- product rule for derivatives says that (fg)' = f'g'. If f(x) =
- exp(x^2), determine, with proof, whether there exists an open interval
- (a,b) and a non-zero function g defined on (a,b) such that the wrong
- product rule is true for x in (a,b).
-
- Problem A-3: Determine, with proof, the set of real numbers x for
- which sum from n=1 to infinity of ((1/n)csc(1/n) - 1)^x converges.
-
- Problem A-4:
- (a) If every point on the plane is painted one of three colors, do
- there necessarily exist two points of the same color exactly one inch
- apart?
- (b) What if "three" is replaced by "nine"?
- Justify your answers.
-
- Problem A-5: Prove that there exists a *unique* function f from the
- set R+ of positive real numbers to R+ such that
- f(f(x)) = 6x - f(x) and f(x) > 0 for all x > 0.
-
- Problem A-6: If a linear transformation A on an n-dimensional vector
- space has n + 1 eigenvectors such that any n of them are linearly
- independent, does it follow that A is a scalar multiple of the
- identity? Prove your answer.
-
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Problem B-1: A *composite* (positive integer) is a product ab with a
- and b not necessarily distinct integers in {2,3,4,...}. Show that
- every composite is expressible as xy + xz + yz + 1, with x, y, and z
- positive integers.
-
- Problem B-2: Prove or disprove: If x and y are real numbers with y >= 0
- and y(y+1) <= (x+1)^2, then y(y-1) <= x^2.
-
- Problem B-3: For every n in the set Z+ = {1,2,...} of positive
- integers, let r(n) be the minimum value of |c-d sqrt(3)| for all
- nonnegative integers c and d with c + d = n. Find, with proof, the
- smallest positive real number g with r(n) <= g for all n in Z+.
-
- Problem B-4: Prove that if sum from n=1 to infinity a(n) is a
- convergent series of positive real numbers, then so is
- sum from n=1 to infinity (a(n))^(n/(n+1)).
-
- Problem B-5: For positive integers n, let M(n) be the 2n + 1 by 2n + 1
- skew-symmetric matrix for which each entry in the first n subdiagonals
- below the main diagonal is 1 and each of the remaining entries below
- the main diagonal is -1. Find, with proof, the rank of M(n).
- (According to the definition the rank of a matrix is the largest k
- such that there is a k x k submatrix with non-zero determinant.)
-
- One may note that M(1) = ( 0 -1 1 ) and M(2) = ( 0 -1 -1 1 1 )
- ( 1 0 -1 ) ( 1 0 -1 -1 1 )
- ( -1 1 0 ) ( 1 1 0 -1 -1 )
- ( -1 1 1 0 -1 )
- ( -1 -1 1 1 0 )
-
- Problem B-6: Prove that there exist an infinite number of ordered
- pairs (a,b) of integers such that for every positive integer t the
- number at + b is a triangular number if and only if t is a triangular
- number. (The triangular numbers are the t(n) = n(n + 1)/2 with n in
- {0,1,2,...}.)
-
- ==> competition/tests/math/putnam/putnam.1988.s <==
- %
- % Layout
- %
- \def\layout{\hsize 150truemm % 210mm - 1in * 2 for margins
- \vsize 246truemm % 297mm - 1in * 2 for margins
- \advance \vsize by -24 pt
- \topskip=10pt plus 1 pt}
- \magnification=1200
- \layout
- \parindent=0pt
- \parskip=\medskipamount
- \newdimen\digitindent \digitindent=16truemm
- \newdimen\solindent \solindent=24truemm
- \newdimen\problemskip\newdimen\subproblemskip
- \problemskip=\bigskipamount \subproblemskip=\medskipamount
- \hoffset=\digitindent
- \def\problem #1 { \vskip \problemskip\hskip-\digitindent\hbox to\digitindent
- {\bf #1\hfill}\ignorespaces}
- \def\solution #1 { \vskip \problemskip\hskip-\solindent\hbox to\solindent
- {\bf #1\hfill}\ignorespaces}
- \def\notes #1 { \vskip \problemskip\hskip-\solindent\hbox to\solindent
- {\bf #1\hfill}\ignorespaces}
- \def\subproblem #1 {\vskip \subproblemskip\hskip-\digitindent
- \hbox to\digitindent{\hfill{\bf #1}\hfill}\ignorespaces}
- \def\endpage {\vfill\supereject\dosupereject}
- \headline={\headlinemacro}
- \footline={\hfil}
- \def\activeheadline{\hglue -\digitindent
- Chris Long, Rutgers University \hfill January 22, 1989}
- \let\headlinemacro=\activeheadline
- \advance \baselineskip by 6pt
- %
- % Aliases
- %
- \def\streck{\hbox {\vbox {\vfill \hrule width 0.5pt height 6pt \vskip 0.7pt}}}
- \def\C{\hbox{\hskip 1.5pt \streck \hskip -3.2pt {\rm C}}}
- \def\Q{\hbox{ \streck \hskip -3pt {\rm Q}}}
- \def\negativethinspace{\mskip-\thinmuskip}
- \def\R{\hbox{$\rm I \negativethinspace R $}}
- \def\Z{\hbox{$\rm Z \negativethinspace \negativethinspace Z $}}
- \def\N{\hbox{$\rm I \negativethinspace N $}}
- \def\H{\hbox{$\rm I \negativethinspace H $}}
- \def\adj{\rm adj}
- \def\det{\rm det}
- \def\Matrix#1{\left\lgroup\matrix{#1}\rgroup\right}
- \def\mod #1 {({\rm mod~}#1)}
- \def\Mod #1 {\ ({\rm mod~}#1)}
- \def\ceil#1{\lceil #1 \rceil}
- \def\floor#1{\lfloor #1 \rfloor}
- %
- % Body of article
- %
- \problem {A-1:}
- Let $R$ be the region consisting of the points $(x,y)$ of the cartesian
- plane satisfying both $|x| - |y| \le 1$ and $|y| \le 1$. Sketch the
- region $R$ and find its area.
-
- \solution {Solution:}
- The area is $6$; the graph I leave to the reader.
-
- \problem {A-2:}
- A not uncommon calculus mistake is to believe that the product rule for
- derivatives says that $(fg)' = f'g'$. If $f(x) = e^{x^{2}}$, determine,
- with proof, whether there exists an open interval $(a,b)$ and a non-zero
- function $g$ defined on $(a,b)$ such that the wrong product rule
- is true for $x$ in $(a,b)$.
-
- \solution {Solution:}
- We find all such functions. Note that $(fg)' = f'g' \Rightarrow f'g'
- = f'g + fg'$ hence if $g(x), f'(x) - f(x) \neq 0$ we get that $g'(x)/g(x)
- = f'(x)/(f'(x) - f(x))$. For the particular $f$ given, we then get that
- $g'(x)/g(x) = (2x)e^{x^2}/( (2x-1) (e^{x^2}) ) \Rightarrow g'(x)/g(x) =
- 2x/(2x-1)$ (since $e^{x^2} > 0$). Integrating, we deduce that $\ln{|g(x)|}
- = x + (1/2)\ln{|2x-1|} + c$ (an arbitrary constant) $\Rightarrow |g(x)|
- = e^{c} \sqrt{|2x-1|} e^{x} \Rightarrow g(x) = C \sqrt{|2x-1|} e^{x}, C$
- arbitrary $\neq 0$. We finish by noting that any $g(x)$ so defined is
- differentiable on any open interval that does not contain $1/2$.
-
- Q.E.D.
-
- \problem {A-3:}
- Determine, with proof, the set of real numbers $x$ for which
- $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} {( {1\over n} \csc ({1\over n}) - 1)}^{x}$
- converges.
-
- \solution {Solution:}
- The answer is $x > {1\over 2}$. To see this, note that by Taylor's
- theorem with remainder $\sin( {1\over{n}} ) = \sum_{i=1}^{k-1}
- { {(-1)}^{i-1} {n}^{-(2i+1)} } + c { {(-1)}^{k-1} {n}^{-(2k+1)} }$,
- where $0 \leq c \leq {1\over n}$. Hence for $n\geq 1 ( 1/n )/( 1/n -
- 1/(3! n^{3}) + 1/(5! n^{5}) - 1 < (1/n) \csc(1/n) - 1 < ( 1/n )/( 1/n
- - 1/(3! n^{3}) ) - 1 \Rightarrow$ for $n$ large enough, $ (1/2) 1/(3! n^{2})
- < (1/n) \csc(1/n) - 1 < 2\cdot 1/(3! n^{2})$. Applying the p-test and the
- comparison test, we see that $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} {( {1\over n}
- \csc({1\over n}) - 1)}^{x}$ converges iff $x > {1\over 2}$.
-
- Q.E.D.
-
- \problem {A-4:}
- Justify your answers.
-
- \subproblem {(a)}
- If every point on the plane is painted one of three colors, do there
- necessarily exist two points of the same color exactly one inch apart?
-
- \solution {Solution:}
- The answer is yes. Assume not and consider two equilateral
- triangles with side one that have exactly one common face $\Rightarrow$
- all points a distance of $\sqrt{3}$ apart are the same color; now
- considering a triangle with sides $\sqrt{3}, \sqrt{3}, 1$ we reach the
- desired contradiction.
-
- Here is a pretty good list of references for the chromatic number of
- the plane (i.e., how many colors do you need so that no two points 1
- away are the same color) up to around 1982 (though the publication
- dates are up to 1985). This asks for the chromatic number of the graph
- where two points in R^2 are connected if they are distance 1 apart.
- Let this chromatic number be chi(2) and in general let chi(n) be the
- chromatic number of R^n. By a theorem in [2] this is equivalent to
- finding what the maximum chromatic number of a finite subgraph of this
- infinite graph is.
-
- [1] H. Hadwiger, ``Ein Ueberdeckungssatz f\"ur den
- Euklidischen Raum,'' Portugal. Math. #4 (1944), p.140-144
-
- This seems to be the original reference for the problem
-
- [2] N.G. de Bruijn and P. Erd\"os, ``A Color Problem for Infinite
- Graphs and a Problem in the Theory of Relations,'' Nederl. Akad.
- Wetensch. (Indag Math) #13 (1951), p. 371-373.
-
- [3] H. Hadwiger, ``Ungel\"oste Probleme No. 40,'' Elemente der Math.
- #16 (1961), p. 103-104.
-
- Gives the upper bound of 7 with the hexagonal tiling and also
- a reference to a Portugese journal where it appeared.
-
- [4] L. Moser and W. Moser, ``Solution to Problem 10,'' Canad. Math.
- Bull. #4 (1961), p. 187-189.
-
- Shows that any 6 points in the plane only need 3 colors but
- gives 7 points that require 4 (``the Moser Graph'' see [7]).
-
- [5] Paul Erd\"os, Frank Harary, and William T. Tutte, ``On the
- Dimension of a Graph,'' Mathematika #12 (1965), p. 118-122.
-
- States that 3<chi(2)<8. Proves that chi(n) is finite for all n.
-
- [6] P. Erd\"os, ``Problems and Results in Combinatorial Geometry,''
- in ``Discrete Geometry and Convexity,'' Edited by Jacob E. Goodman,
- Erwin Lutwak, Joseph Malkevitch, and Richard Pollack, Annals of
- the New York Academy of Sciences Vol. 440, New York Academy of
- Sciences 1985, Pages 1-11.
-
- States that 3<chi(n)<8 and ``I am almost sure that chi(2)>4.''
- States a question of L. Moser: Let R be large and S a measurable
- set in the circle of radius R so that no two points of S have
- distance 1. Denote by m(S) the measure of S. Determine
-
- Lim_{R => infty} max m(S)/R^2.
-
- Erd\"os conjectures that this limit is less than 1/4.
-
- Erd\"os asks the following: ``Let S be a subset of the plane. Join
- two points of S if their distances is 1. This gives a graph G(S).
- Assume that the girth (shortest circuit) of G(S) is k. Can its
- chromatic number be greater than 3? Wormald proved that such
- a graph exists for k<6. The problem is open for k>5. Wormald
- suggested that this method may work for k=6, but probably a
- new idea is needed for k>6. A related (perhaps identical)
- question is: `Does G(S) have a subgraph that has girth k and
- chromatic number 4?' ''
-
- [7] N. Wormald, ``A 4-chromatic graph with a special plane drawing,''
- J. Austr. Math. Soc. Ser. A #28 (1970), p. 1-8.
-
- The reference for the above question.
-
- [8] R.L. Graham, ``Old and New Euclidean Ramsey Theorems,''
- in ``Discrete Geometry and Convexity,'' Edited by Jacob E. Goodman,
- Erwin Lutwak, Joseph Malkevitch, and Richard Pollack, Annals of
- the New York Academy of Sciences Vol. 440, New York Academy of
- Sciences 1985, Pages 20-30.
-
- States that the best current bounds are 3<chi(2)<8. Calls the
- graph in [3] the Moser graph. Quotes the result of Frankl and
- Wilson [8] that chi(n) grows exponentially in n settling an
- earlier conjecture of Erd\"os (I don't know the reference for
- this). The best available bounds for this are
-
- (1+ o(1)) (1.2)^n \le chi(n) \le (3+ o(1))^n.
-
- [9] P. Frankl and R.M. Wilson, ``Intersection Theorems with Geometric
- Consequences,'' Combinatorica #1 (1981), p. 357-368.
-
- [10] H. Hadwiger, H. Debrunner, and V.L. Klee, ``Combinatorial
- Geometry in the Plane,'' Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York
- (English edition, 1964).
-
- [11] D.R. Woodall, ``Distances Realized by Sets Covering the Plane,''
- Journal of Combinatorial Theory (A) #14 (1973), p. 187-200.
-
- Among other things, shows that rational points in the plane can
- be two colored.
-
- [12] L. A. Sz\'ekely, ``Measurable Chromatic Number of Geometric
- Graphs and Sets without some Distances in Euclidean Space,''
- Combinatorica #4 (1984), p.213-218.
-
- Considers \chi_m(R^2), the measurable chromatic number,
- where sets of one color must be Lebesgue measurable.
- He conjectures that \chi_m(R^2) is not equal to
- \chi(R^2) (if the Axiom of Choice is false).
-
- [13] Martin Gardner, ``Scientific American,'' October 1960, p. 160.
-
- [14] Martin Gardner, ``Wheels, Life and other Mathematical Amusements,''
- W.H. Freeman and Co., New York 1983, pages 195-196.
-
- This occurs in a chapter on mathematical problems including
- the 3x+1 problem. I think that his references are wrong, including
- attributing the problem to Erd\"os and claiming that Charles Trigg
- had original solutions in ``Problem 133,'' Crux Mathematicorum,
- Vol. 2, 1976, pages 144-150.
-
- Q.E.D.
-
- \subproblem {(b)}
- What if "three" is replaced by "nine"?
-
- In this case, there does not necessarily exist two points of the same
- color exactly one inch apart; this can be demonstrated by considering
- a tessellation of the plane by a $3\times 3$ checkboard with side $2$,
- with each component square a different color (color of boundary points
- chosen in an obvious manner).
-
- Q.E.D.
-
- The length of the side of the checkerboard is not critical (the reader
- my enjoy showing that $3/2 <$ side $< 3\sqrt{2}/2$ works).
-
- \problem {A-5:}
- Prove that there exists a {\it unique} function $f$ from the set
- ${\R}^{+}$ of positive real numbers to ${\R}^{+}$ such that $f(f(x))
- = 6x - f(x)$ and $f(x) > 0$ for all $x > 0$.
-
- \solution {Solution 1:}
-
- Clearly $f(x) = 2x$ is one such solution; we need to show that it is the
- {\it only} solution. Let $f^{1}(x) = f(x), f^{n}(x) = f(f^{n-1}(x))$ and
- notice that $f^{n}(x)$ is defined for all $x>0$. An easy induction
- establishes that for $n>0 f^{n}(x) = a_{n} x + b_{n} f(x)$, where $a_{0}
- = 0, b_{0} = 1$ and $a_{n+1} = 6 b_{n}, b_{n+1} = a_{n} - b_{n}
- \Rightarrow b_{n+1} = 6 b_{n-1} - b_{n}$. Solving this latter equation
- in the standard manner, we deduce that $\lim_{n\to \infty} a_{n}/b_{n}
- = -2$, and since we have that $f^{n}(x) > 0$ and since $b_{n}$ is
- alternately negative and positive; we conclude that $2x \leq f(x) \leq 2x$
- by letting $n \rightarrow \infty$.
-
- Q.E.D.
-
- \solution {Solution 2:}
- (Dan Bernstein, Princeton)
-
- As before, $f(x) = 2x$ works. We must show that if $f(x) = 2x + g(x)$
- and $f$ satisfies the conditions then $g(x) = 0$ on ${\R}^{+}$.
- Now $f(f(x)) = 6x - f(x)$ means that $2f(x) + g(f(x)) = 6x - 2x - g(x)$,
- i.e., $4x + 2g(x) + g(f(x)) = 4x - g(x)$, i.e., $3g(x) + g(f(x)) = 0$.
- This then implies $g(f(f(x))) = 9g(x)$. Also note that $f(x) > 0$
- implies $g(x) > -2x$. Suppose $g(x)$ is not $0$ everywhere. Pick $y$
- at which $g(y) \neq 0$. If $g(y) > 0$, observe $g(f(y)) = -3g(y) < 0$,
- so in any case there is a $y_{0}$ with $g(y_{0}) < 0$. Now define $y_{1}
- = f(f(y_{0})), y_{2} = f(f(y_{1}))$, etc. We know $g(y_{n+1})$ equals
- $g(f(f(y_{n}))) = 9g(y_{n})$. But $y(n+1) = f(f(y_{n})) = 6y_{n} -
- f(y_{n}) < 6y_{n}$ since $f>0$. Hence for each $n$ there exists
- $y_{n} < 6^{n} y_{0}$ such that $g(y_{n}) = 9^{n} g(y_{0})$.
- The rest is obvious: $0 > g(y_{0}) = 9^{-n} g(y_{n}) > -2\cdot 9^{-n}
- y_{n} > -2 (6/9)^{n} y_{0}$, and we observe that as $n$ goes to infinity
- we have a contradiction.
-
- Q.E.D.
-
- \problem {A-6:}
- If a linear transformation $A$ on an $n$-dimensional vector space has
- $n+1$ eigenvectors such that any $n$ of them are linearly independent,
- does it follow that $A$ is a scalar multiple of the identity? Prove your
- answer.
-
- \solution {Solution:}
- The answer is yes. First note that if $x_{1}, \ldots, x_{n+1}$ are the
- eigenvectors, then we must have that $a_{n+1} x_{n+1} = a_{1} x_{1}
- + \cdots + a_{n} x_{n}$ for some non-zero scalars $a_{1}, \ldots, a_{n+1}$.
- Multiplying by $A$ on the left we see that $\lambda_{n+1} a_{n+1} x_{n+1}
- = \lambda_{1} a_{1} x_{1} + \cdots + \lambda_{n} a_{n} x_{n}$, where
- $\lambda_{i}$ is the eigenvalue corresponding to the eigenvectors $x_{i}$.
- But since we also have that $\lambda_{n+1} a_{n+1} x_{n+1} = \lambda_{n+1}
- a_{1} x_{1} + \cdots + \lambda_{n+1} a_{n} x_{n}$ we conclude that
- $\lambda_{1} a_{1} x_{1} + \cdots + \lambda_{n} a_{n} x_{n} = \lambda_{n+1}
- a_{1} x_{1} + \cdots + \lambda_{n+1} a_{n} x_{n} \Rightarrow a_{1}
- (\lambda_{1} - \lambda_{n+1}) x_{1} + \cdots + a_{n} (\lambda_{n} -
- \lambda_{n+1}) x_{1} = 0 \Rightarrow \lambda_{1} = \cdots = \lambda_{n+1}
- = \lambda$ since $x_{1}, \ldots, x_{n}$ are linearly independent. To
- finish, note that the dimension of the eigenspace of $\lambda$ is equal
- to $n$, and since this equals the dimension of the nullspace of $A -
- \lambda I$ we conclude that the rank of $A - \lambda I$ equals $n - n =
- 0 \Rightarrow A - \lambda I = 0$.
-
- Q.E.D.
-
- \problem {B-1:}
- A {\it composite} (positive integer) is a product $ab$ with $a$ and $b$
- not necessarily distinct integers in $\{ 2,3,4,\ldots \}$. Show that
- every composite is expressible as $xy + xz + yz + 1$, with $x, y$, and
- $z$ positive integers.
-
- \solution {Solution:}
- Let $x = a-1, y = b-1, z = 1$; we then get that $xy + xz + yz + 1
- = (a-1)(b-1) + a-1 + b-1 + 1 = ab$.
-
- Q.E.D.
-
- \problem {B-2:}
- Prove or disprove: If $x$ and $y$ are real numbers with $y \geq 0$
- and $y(y+1) \leq {(x+1)}^2$, then $y(y-1) \leq x^2$.
-
- \solution {Solution:}
- The statement is true. If $x+1 \geq 0$ we have that $\sqrt{y(y+1)}
- - 1 \leq x \Rightarrow x^{2} \geq y^{2} + y + 1 - 2 \sqrt{y^{2}+y} \geq
- y^{2} - y$ since $2y + 1 \geq 2 \sqrt{y^{2}+y}$ since ${(2y + 1)}^{2}
- \geq 4 (y^{2}+y)$ if $y\geq 0$. If $x+1 < 0$, we see that $\sqrt{y(y+1)}
- \leq -x - 1 \Rightarrow x^{2} \geq y^{2} + y + 1 + 2 \sqrt{y^{2}+y}
- \geq y^{2} - y$.
-
- Q.E.D.
-
- \problem {B-3:}
- For every $n$ in the set ${\Z}^{+} = \{ 1,2,\ldots \}$ of positive
- integers, let $r(n)$ be the minimum value of $|c-d \sqrt{3}|$ for all
- nonnegative integers $c$ and $d$ with $c + d = n$. Find, with proof,
- the smallest positive real number $g$ with $r(n) \leq g$ for all $n$
- in ${\Z}^{+}$.
-
- \solution {Solution:}
- The answer is $(1 + \sqrt{3})/2$. We write $|c-d\sqrt{3}|$ as
- $|(n-d) - d\sqrt{3}|$; I claim that the minimum over all $d, 0 \leq d
- \leq n$, occurs when $d = e = \floor{n/(1+\sqrt{3})}$ or when $d = f =
- e+1 = \floor{n/(1+\sqrt{3})} + 1$. To see this, note that $(n-e) - e
- \sqrt{3} > 0$ and if $e'<e$, then $(n-e') - e' \sqrt{3} > (n-e) - e
- \sqrt{3}$, and similarly for $f'>f$. Now let $r = n/(1+\sqrt{3}) -
- \floor{n/(1+\sqrt{3})}$ and note that $|(n-e) - e \sqrt{3}| = r
- (1+\sqrt{3})$ and $|(n-f) - f \sqrt{3}| = (1-r) (1+\sqrt{3})$. Clearly
- one of these will be $\leq (1+\sqrt{3})/2$. To see that $(1+\leq{3})/2$
- cannot be lowered, note that since $1+\sqrt{3}$ is irrational, $r$ is
- uniformly distributed $\mod{1} $.
-
- Q.E.D.
-
- \notes {Notes:}
- We do not really need the result that $x$ irrational $\Rightarrow x n
- - \floor{x n}$ u. d. $\mod{1} $, it would suffice to show that $x$
- irrational $\Rightarrow x n - \floor{x n}$ is dense in $(0,1)$. But
- this is obvious, since if $x$ is irrational there exists arbitrarily
- large $q$ such that there exists $p$ with $(p,q) = 1$ such that $p/q <
- x < (p+1)/q$. The nifty thing about the u. d. result is that it answers
- the question: what number $x$ should we choose such that the density
- of $\{ n : r(n) < x \}$ equals $t, 0 < t < 1$? The u. d. result implies
- that the answer is $t (1+\sqrt{3})/2$. The u. d. result also provides
- the key to the question: what is the average value of $r(n)$? The
- answer is $(1+\sqrt{3})/4$.
-
- \problem {B-4:}
- Prove that if $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a(n)$ is a convergent series of
- positive real numbers, then so is $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} {(a(n))}^{n/(n+1)}$.
-
- \solution {Solution:}
- Note that the subseries of terms ${a(n)}^{n\over{n+1}}$ with
- ${a(n)}^{1\over{n+1}} \leq {1\over 2}$ converges since then
- ${a(n)}^{n\over{n+1}}$ is dominated by $1/2^{n}$, the subseries of
- terms ${a(n)}^{n\over{n+1}}$ with ${a(n)}^{1\over{n+1}} > {1\over 2}$
- converges since then ${a(n)}^{n\over{n+1}}$ is dominated by $2 a(n)$,
- hence $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} {a(n)}^{n\over{n+1}}$ converges.
-
- Q.E.D.
-
- \problem {B-5:}
- For positive integers $n$, let $M(n)$ be the $2n + 1$ by $2n + 1$
- skew-symmetric matrix for which each entry in the first $n$ subdiagonals
- below the main diagonal is $1$ and each of the remaining entries below
- the main diagonal is $-1$. Find, with proof, the rank of $M(n)$.
- (According to the definition the rank of a matrix is the largest $k$
- such that there is a $k \times k$ submatrix with non-zero determinant.)
-
- One may note that \break\hfill
- $M(1) = \left( \matrix{0&-1&1 \cr 1&0&-1
- \cr -1&1&0} \right)$ and $M(2) = \left( \matrix{0&-1&-1&1&1
- \cr 1&0&-1&-1&1 \cr 1&1&0&-1&-1 \cr -1&1&1&0&-1 \cr -1&-1&1&1&0}
- \right)$.
-
- \solution {Solution 1:}
- Since $M(n)$ is skew-symmetric, $M(n)$ is singular for all $n$, hence
- the rank can be at most $2n$. To see that this is indeed the answer,
- consider the submatrix $M_{i}(n)$ obtained by deleting row $i$ and column
- $i$ from $M(n)$. From the definition of the determinant we have that
- $\det(M_{i}(n)) = \sum {(-1)}^{\delta(k)} a_{1 k(1)} \cdots a_{(2n) k(2n)}$,
- where $k$ is member of $S_{2n}$ (the group of permutations on
- $\{1,\ldots,2n\}$) and $\delta(k)$ is $0$ if $k$ is an even permutation or
- $1$ if $k$ is an odd permutation. Now note that ${(-1)}^{\delta(k)}
- a_{1 k(1)} \cdots a_{(2n) k(2n)}$ equals either $0$ or $\pm 1$, and is
- non-zero iff $k(i) \neq i$ for all $i$, i.e. iff $k$ has no fixed points.
- If we can now show that the set of all elements $k$ of $S_{2n}$, with
- $k(i) \neq i$ for all $i$, has odd order, we win since this would imply that
- $\det(M_{i}(n))$ is odd $\Rightarrow \det(M_{i}) \neq 0$. To show this,
- let $f(n)$ equal the set of all elements $k$ of $S_n$ with $k(i) \neq
- i$ for all $i$. We have that $f(1) = 0, f(2) = 1$ and we see that
- $f(n) = (n-1) ( f(n-1) + f(n-2) )$ by considering the possible values of
- $f(1)$ and whether or not $f(f(1)) = 1$; an easy induction now establishes
- that $f(2n)$ is odd for all $n$.
-
- Q.E.D.
-
- \notes {Notes:}
- In fact, it is a well-known result that $f(n) = n! ( 1/2! - 1/3! + \cdots
- + {(-1)}^{n}/n! )$.
-
- \solution {Solution 2:}
- As before, since $M(n)$ is skew-symmetric $M(n)$ is singular for all $n$
- and hence can have rank at most $2n$. To see that this is the rank,
- let $M_{i}(n)$ be the submatrix obtained by deleting row $i$ and column
- $i$ from $M(n)$. We finish by noting that ${M_{i}(n)}^{2} \equiv
- I_{2n} \Mod{2} $, hence $M_{i}(n)$ is nonsingular.
-
- Q.E.D.
-
- \problem {B-6:}
- Prove that there exist an infinite number of ordered pairs $(a,b)$ of
- integers such that for every positive integer $t$ the number $at + b$
- is a triangular number if and only if $t$ is a triangular number.
- (The triangular numbers are the $t(n) = n(n + 1)/2$ with $n$ in
- $ \{ 0,1,2,\ldots \}$ ).
-
- \solution {Solution:}
- Call a pair of integers $(a,b)$ a {\it triangular pair} if $at + b$
- is a triangular number iff $t$ is a triangular number. I claim that
- $(9,1)$ is a triangular pair. Note that $9 (n(n+1)/2) + 1 =
- (3n+1)(3n+2)/2$ hence $9t+1$ is triangular if $t$ is. For the other
- direction, note that if $ 9t+1 = n(n+1)/2 \Rightarrow n = 3k+1$
- hence $ 9t+1 = n(n+1)/2 = 9(k(k+1)/2)+1 \Rightarrow t = k(k+1)/2$,
- therefore $t$ is triangular. Now note that if $(a,b)$ is a triangular
- pair then so is $(a^{2},(a+1)b)$, hence we can generate an infinite
- number of triangular pairs starting with $(9,1)$.
-
- Q.E.D.
-
- \notes {Notes:}
- The following is a proof of necessary and sufficient conditions for $(a,b)$
- to be a triangular pair.
-
- I claim that $(a,b)$ is a triangular pair iff for some odd integer $o$
- we have that $a = o^{2}, b = (o^{2}-1)/8$. I will first prove the
- direction $\Leftarrow$. Assume we have $a = o^{2}, b = (o^{2}-1)/8$.
- If $t = n(n+1)/2$ is any triangular number, then the identity $o^{2}
- n(n+1)/2 + (o^{2}-1)/8 = (on + (o-1)/2) (on + (o+1)/2)/2$ shows that
- $at + b$ is also a triangular number. On the other hand if $o^{2} t +
- (o^{2}-1)/8 = n(n+1)/2$, the above identity implies we win if we can show
- that $( n - (o-1)/2 )/o$ is an integer, but this is true since $o^{2} t +
- (o^{2}-1)/8 \equiv n(n+1)/2 \Mod{o^{2}} \Rightarrow 4n^{2} + 4n \equiv -1
- \Mod{o^{2}} \Rightarrow {(2n + 1)}^{2} \equiv 0 \Mod{o^{2}} \Rightarrow 2n + 1
- \equiv 0 \Mod{o} \Rightarrow n \equiv (o-1)/2 \Mod{o} $. For the direction
- $\Rightarrow$ assume that $(a,b)$ and $(a,c), c\ge b$, are both triangular
- pairs; to see that $b = c$ notice that if $at + b$ is triangular for all
- triangular numbers $t$, then we can choose $t$ so large that if $c>b$ then
- $at + c$ falls between two consecutive triangular numbers; contradiction hence
- $b = c$. Now assume that $(a,c)$ and $(b,c)$ are both triangular pairs;
- I claim that $a = b$. But this is clear since if $(a,c)$ and $(b,c)$
- are triangular pairs $\Rightarrow (ab,bc+c)$ and $(ab,ac+c)$ are
- triangular pairs $\Rightarrow bc+c = ac+c$ by the above reasoning
- $\Rightarrow bc=ac \Rightarrow$ either $a=b$ or $c=0 \Rightarrow a=b$
- since $c=0 \Rightarrow a=b=1$. For a proof of this last assertion,
- assume $(a,0), a>1$, is a triangular pair; to see that this gives a
- contradiction note that if $(a,0)$ is a triangular pair $\Rightarrow
- (a^{2},0)$ is also triangular pair, but this is impossible since then
- we must have that $a(a^{3}+1)/2$ is triangular (since $a^{2} a (a^{3}+1)/2$
- is triangular) but $(a^{2}-1)a^{2}/2 < a(a^{3}+1)/2 < a^{2}(a^{2}+1)/2$
- (if $a>1$). We are now done, since if $(a,b)$ is a triangular pair
- $\Rightarrow a 0 + b = n(n+1)/2$ for some $n\geq 0 \Rightarrow b =
- ({(2n+1)}^{2} - 1)/8$.
-
- Q.E.D.
-
- \bye
-
- ==> competition/tests/math/putnam/putnam.1990.p <==
- Problem A-1
- How many primes among the positive integers, written as usual in base
- 10, are such that their digits are alternating 1's and 0's, beginning
- and ending with 1?
-
- Problem A-2
- Evaluate \int_0^a \int_0^b \exp(\max{b^2 x^2, a^2 y^2}) dy dx where a and
- b are positive.
-
- Problem A-3
- Prove that if 11z^10 + 10iz^9 + 10iz - 11 = 0, then |z| = 1. (Here z is
- a complex number and i^2 = -1.)
-
- Problem A-4
- If \alpha is an irrational number, 0 < \alpha < 1, is there a finite
- game with an honest coin such that the probability of one player winning
- the game is \alpha? (An honest coin is one for which the probability of
- heads and the probability of tails are both 1/2. A game is finite if
- with probability 1 it must end in a finite number of moves.)
-
- Problem A-5
- Let m be a positive integer and let G be a regular (2m + 1)-gon
- inscribed in the unit circle. Show that there is a positive constant A,
- independent of m, with the following property. For any point p inside G
- there are two distinct vertices v_1 and v_2 of G such that
- 1 A
- | |p - v_1| - |p - v_2| | < --- - ---.
- m m^3
- Here |s - t| denotes the distance between the points s and t.
-
- Problem A-6
- Let \alpha = 1 + a_1 x + a_2 x^2 + ... be a formal power series with
- coefficients in the field of two elements. Let
- / 1 if every block of zeros in the binary expansion of n
- / has an even number of zeros in the block,
- a_n = {
- \ 0 otherwise.
- (For example, a_36 = 1 because 36 = 100100_2 and a_20 = 0 because 20 =
- 10100_2.) Prove that \alpha^3 + x \alpha + 1 = 0.
-
- Problem B-1
- A dart, thrown at random, hits a square target. Assuming that any two
- points of the target of equal area are equally likely to be hit, find
- the probability that the point hit is nearer to the center than to any
- edge. Express your answer in the form (a \sqrt(b) + c) / d, where a, b,
- c, d are integers.
-
- Problem B-2
- Let S be a non-empty set with an associative operation that is left and
- right cancellative (xy = xz implies y = z, and yx = zx implies y = z).
- Assume that for every a in S the set { a^n : n = 1, 2, 3, ... } is
- finite. Must S be a group?
-
- Problem B-3
- Let f be a function on [0,\infty), differentiable and satisfying
- f'(x) = -3 f(x) + 6 f(2x)
- for x > 0. Assume that |f(x)| <= \exp(-\sqrt(x)) for x >= 0 (so that
- f(x) tends rapidly to 0 as x increases). For n a non-negative integer,
- define
- \mu_n = \int_0^\infty x^n f(x) dx
- (sometimes called the nth moment of f).
- a. Express \mu_n in terms of \mu_0.
- b. Prove that the sequence { \mu_n 3^n / n! } always converges, and that
- the limit is 0 only if \mu_0 = 0.
-
- Problem B-4
- Can a countably infinite set have an uncountable collection of non-empty
- subsets such that the intersection of any two of them is finite?
-
- Problem B-5
- Label the vertices of a trapezoid T (quadrilateral with two parallel
- sides) inscribed in the unit circle as A, B, C, D so that AB is parallel
- to CD and A, B, C, D are in counterclockwise order. Let s_1, s_2, and d
- denote the lengths of the line segments AB, CD, and OE, where E is the
- point of intersection of the diagonals of T, and O is the center of the
- circle. Determine the least upper bound of (s_1 - s_2) / d over all such
- T for which d \ne 0, and describe all cases, if any, in which it is
- attained.
-
- Problem B-6
- Let (x_1, x_2, ..., x_n) be a point chosen at random from the
- n-dimensional region defined by 0 < x_1 < x_2 < ... < x_n < 1.
- Let f be a continuous function on [0, 1] with f(1) = 0. Set x_0 = 0 and
- x_{n+1} = 1. Show that the expected value of the Riemann sum
- \sum_{i = 0}^n (x_{i+1} - x_i) f(x_{i+1})
- is \int_0^1 f(t)P(t) dt, where P is a polynomial of degree n,
- independent of f, with 0 \le P(t) \le 1 for 0 \le t \le 1.
-
- ==> competition/tests/math/putnam/putnam.1990.s <==
- Problem A-1
- How many primes among the positive integers, written as usual in base
- 10, are such that their digits are alternating 1's and 0's, beginning
- and ending with 1?
-
- Solution:
- Exactly one, namely 101. 1 is not prime; 101 is prime. The sum
- 100^n + 100^{n - 1} + ... + 1 is divisible by 101 if n is odd,
- 10^n + 10^{n - 1} + ... + 1 if n is even. (To see the second part,
- think about 101010101 = 102030201 - 1020100 = 10101^2 - 1010^2.)
-
- Problem A-2
- Evaluate \int_0^a \int_0^b \exp(\max{b^2 x^2, a^2 y^2}) dy dx where a and
- b are positive.
-
- Solution:
- Split the inner integral according to the max{}. The easy term becomes
- an integral of t e^{t^2}. The other term becomes an easy term after you
- switch the order of integration. Your answer should have an e^{(ab)^2}.
-
- Problem A-3
- Prove that if 11z^10 + 10iz^9 + 10iz - 11 = 0, then |z| = 1. (Here z is
- a complex number and i^2 = -1.)
-
- Solution:
- z is not zero, so divide by z^5 to make things a bit more symmetric.
- Now write z = e^{i \theta} and watch the formula dissolve into a simple
- trigonometric sum. The 11 sin 5 \theta term dominates the sum when that
- sine is at its maximum; by this and similar considerations, just *write
- down* enough maxima and minima of the function that it must have ten
- real roots for \theta. (This cute solution is due to Melvin Hausner,
- an NYU math professor.)
-
- Problem A-4
- If \alpha is an irrational number, 0 < \alpha < 1, is there a finite
- game with an honest coin such that the probability of one player winning
- the game is \alpha? (An honest coin is one for which the probability of
- heads and the probability of tails are both 1/2. A game is finite if
- with probability 1 it must end in a finite number of moves.)
-
- Solution:
- Yes. Write \alpha in binary---there's no ambiguity since it's irrational.
- At the nth step (n >= 0), flip the coin. If it comes up heads, go to the
- next step. If it comes up tails, you win if the nth bit of \alpha is 1.
- Otherwise you lose. The probability of continuing forever is zero. The
- probability of winning is \alpha.
-
- This problem could have been better stated. Repeated flips of the coin
- must produce independent results. The note that ``finite'' means only
- ``finite with probability 1'' is hidden inside parentheses, even though
- it is crucial to the result. In any case, this problem is not very
- original: I know I've seen similar problems many times, and no serious
- student of probability can take more than ten minutes on the question.
-
- Problem A-5
- Let m be a positive integer and let G be a regular (2m + 1)-gon
- inscribed in the unit circle. Show that there is a positive constant A,
- independent of m, with the following property. For any point p inside G
- there are two distinct vertices v_1 and v_2 of G such that
- 1 A
- | |p - v_1| - |p - v_2| | < --- - ---.
- m m^3
- Here |s - t| denotes the distance between the points s and t.
-
- Solution:
- Place G at the usual roots of unity. Without loss of generality assume
- that p = re^{i\theta} is as close to 1 as to any other vertex; in other
- words, assume |\theta| <= 2\pi / (4m + 2) = \pi / (2m + 1). Now take the
- distance between p and the two farthest (not closest!) vertices. Make
- sure to write | |X| - |Y| | as the ratio of | |X|^2 - |Y|^2 | to |X| + |Y|.
- I may have miscalculated, but I get a final result inversely proportional
- to (4m + 2)^2, from which the given inequality follows easily with, say,
- A = 0.01.
-
- Alternate solution:
- The maximum distance between p and a point of G is achieved between two
- almost-opposite corners, with a distance squared of double 1 + \cos\theta
- for an appropriately small \theta, or something smaller than 2 - A/m^2
- for an appropriate A. Now consider the set of distances between p and
- the vertices; this set is 2m + 1 values >= 0 and < 2 - A/m^2, so that
- there are two values at distance less than 1/m - A/m^3 as desired.
-
- Problem A-6
- Let \alpha = 1 + a_1 x + a_2 x^2 + ... be a formal power series with
- coefficients in the field of two elements. Let
- / 1 if every block of zeros in the binary expansion of n
- / has an even number of zeros in the block,
- a_n = {
- \ 0 otherwise.
- (For example, a_36 = 1 because 36 = 100100_2 and a_20 = 0 because 20 =
- 10100_2.) Prove that \alpha^3 + x \alpha + 1 = 0.
-
- Solution:
- (Put a_0 = 1, of course.) Observe that a_{4n} = a_n since adding two zeros
- on the right end does not affect the defining property; a_{4n + 2} = 0
- since the rightmost zero is isolated; and a_{2n + 1} = a_n since adding
- a one on the right does not affect the defining property. Now work in the
- formal power series ring Z_2[[x]]. For any z in that ring that is a
- multiple of x, define f(z) as a_0 + a_1 z + a_2 z^2 + ... . Clearly
- f(z) = f(z^4) + z f(z^2) by the relations between a's. Now over Z_2,
- (a + b)^2 = a^2 + b^2, so f(z) = f(z)^4 + z f(z)^2. Plug in x for z and
- cancel the f(x) to get 1 = \alpha^3 + x \alpha as desired.
-
- Problem B-1
- A dart, thrown at random, hits a square target. Assuming that any two
- points of the target of equal area are equally likely to be hit, find
- the probability that the point hit is nearer to the center than to any
- edge. Express your answer in the form (a \sqrt(b) + c) / d, where a, b,
- c, d are integers.
-
- Solution:
- This is straightforward. The closer-to-the-center region is centered on
- a square of side length \sqrt 2 - 1; surrounding the square and meeting
- it at its corners are parabolic sections extending out halfway to the
- edge. b is 2 and d is 6; have fun.
-
- Problem B-2
- Let S be a non-empty set with an associative operation that is left and
- right cancellative (xy = xz implies y = z, and yx = zx implies y = z).
- Assume that for every a in S the set { a^n : n = 1, 2, 3, ... } is
- finite. Must S be a group?
-
- Solution:
- Yes. There is a minimal m >= 1 for which a^m = a^n for some n with n > m;
- by cancellation, m must be 1. We claim that a^{n-1} is an identity in S.
- For ba = ba^n = ba^{n-1}a, so by cancellation b = ba^{n-1}, and similarly
- on the other side. Now a has an inverse, a^{n-2}. This problem is not new.
-
- Problem B-3
- Let f be a function on [0,\infty), differentiable and satisfying
- f'(x) = -3 f(x) + 6 f(2x)
- for x > 0. Assume that |f(x)| <= \exp(-\sqrt(x)) for x >= 0 (so that
- f(x) tends rapidly to 0 as x increases). For n a non-negative integer,
- define
- \mu_n = \int_0^\infty x^n f(x) dx
- (sometimes called the nth moment of f).
- a. Express \mu_n in terms of \mu_0.
- b. Prove that the sequence { \mu_n 3^n / n! } always converges, and that
- the limit is 0 only if \mu_0 = 0.
-
- Solution:
- The only trick here is to integrate \mu_n by parts the ``wrong way,''
- towards a higher power of x. A bit of manipulation gives the formula for
- \mu_n as \mu_0 times n! / 3^n times the product of 2^k / (2^k - 1) for
- 1 <= k <= n. Part b is straightforward; the product converges since the
- sum of 1 / (2^k - 1) converges (absolutely---it's positive).
-
- Problem B-4
- Can a countably infinite set have an uncountable collection of non-empty
- subsets such that the intersection of any two of them is finite?
-
- Solution:
- Yes. A common example for this very well-known problem is the set of
- rationals embedded in the set of reals. For each real take a Cauchy
- sequence converging to that real; those sequences form the subsets of
- the countably infinite rationals, and the intersection of any two of
- them had better be finite since the reals are Archimedian. Another
- example, from p-adics: Consider all binary sequences. With sequence
- a_0 a_1 a_2 ... associate the set a_0, a_0 + 2a_1, a_0 + 2a_1 + 4a_2,
- etc.; or stick 1 bits in all the odd positions to simplify housekeeping
- (most importantly, to make the set infinite). Certainly different
- sequences give different sets, and the intersection of two such sets
- is finite.
-
- Alternative solution:
- Let C be a countable collection of non-empty subsets of A with the property
- that any two subsets have finite intersection (from now
- on we call this property, countable intersection property). Clearly
- such a collection exists. We will show that C is not maximal, that is,
- there exists a set which does not belong to C and it intersects finitely
- with any set in C. Hence by Zorn's lemma, C can be extended to an
- uncountable collection.
-
- Let A1, A2, .... be an enumeration of sets in C. Then by axiom of choice,
- pick an element b sub i from each of A sub i - Union {from j=1 to i-1} of
- A sub j. It is easy to see that each such set is non-empty. Let B be the
- set of all b sub i's. Then clearly B is different from each of the A sub i's
- and its intersection with each A sub i is finite.
-
- Yet another alternative solution:
- Let the countable set be the lattice points of the plane. For each t in
- [0,pi) let s(t) be the lattice points in a strip with angle of inclination
- t and width greater than 1. Then the set of these strips is uncountable.
- The intersection of any two is bounded, hence finite.
-
- More solutions:
- The problem (in effect) asks for an uncountable collection of
- sets of natural numbers that are "almost disjoint," i.e., any two
- have a finite intersection. Here are two elementary ways to
- get such a collection.
-
- 1. For any set A={a, b, c, ...} of primes, let A'={a, ab, abc, ...}.
- If A differs from B then A' has only a finite intersection with B'.
-
- 2. For each real number, e.g. x=0.3488012... form the set
- S_x={3, 34, 348, 3488, ...}. Different reals give almost disjoint sets.
-
-
- Problem B-5
- Label the vertices of a trapezoid T (quadrilateral with two parallel
- sides) inscribed in the unit circle as A, B, C, D so that AB is parallel
- to CD and A, B, C, D are in counterclockwise order. Let s_1, s_2, and d
- denote the lengths of the line segments AB, CD, and OE, where E is the
- point of intersection of the diagonals of T, and O is the center of the
- circle. Determine the least upper bound of (s_1 - s_2) / d over all such
- T for which d \ne 0, and describe all cases, if any, in which it is
- attained.
-
- Solution:
- Center the circle at the origin and rotate the trapezoid so that AB and
- CD are horizontal. Assign coordinates to A and D, polar or rectangular
- depending on your taste. Now play with s_1 - s_2 / d for a while;
- eventually you'll find the simple form, after which maximization is
- easy. The answer, if I've calculated right, is 2, achieved when rotating
- the trapezoid by 90 degrees around the circle would take one vertex into
- another. (A right triangle, with the hypoteneuse the length-two diamater
- and d = 1, is a degenerate example.)
-
- Alternative solution:
- Let a be the distance from O (the center of the circle) to AB (that is
- the side with length s1), and b the distance from O to CD. Clearly,
- a = sqrt(1-s1*s1/4) and b = sqrt(1-s2*s2/4). Then with some mathematical
- jugglery, one can show that (s1-s2)/d = (s1*s1-s2*s2)/(b*s1-a*s2).
- Then differentiating this with respect to s1 and s2 and equating to
- 0 yields s1*s1+s2*s2=4, and hence s1=2*b and s2=2*a. The value of (s1-s2)/d
- for these values is then 2. Hence (s1-s1)/d achieves its extremeum when
- s1*s1+s2*s2=4 (that this value is actually a maximum is then easily seen),
- and the lub is 2.
-
- Problem B-6
- Let (x_1, x_2, ..., x_n) be a point chosen at random from the
- n-dimensional region defined by 0 < x_1 < x_2 < ... < x_n < 1.
- Let f be a continuous function on [0, 1] with f(1) = 0. Set x_0 = 0 and
- x_{n+1} = 1. Show that the expected value of the Riemann sum
- \sum_{i = 0}^n (x_{i+1} - x_i) f(x_{i+1})
- is \int_0^1 f(t)P(t) dt, where P is a polynomial of degree n,
- independent of f, with 0 \le P(t) \le 1 for 0 \le t \le 1.
-
- Solution:
- Induct right to left. Show that for each k, given x_{k-1}, the
- expected value at a point chosen with x_{k-1} < x_k < ... < x_n < 1
- is a polynomial of the right type with the right degree. It's pretty
- easy once you find the right direction. 0 \le P(t) \le 1 comes for
- free: if P(t) is out of range at a point, it is out of range on an
- open interval, and setting f to the characteristic function of that
- interval produces a contradiction.
-